Part of the continuous history of the Arabs is the political situation:
Political status of the Arabs
(a)
Victims of imperialism:
Uncontrolled by a central ruler, the Arabs were prey to the greedy gaze of the
two imperialist superpowers of the time, Roman and Persian. North Arabia was
ruled by the Romans and South Arabia by the Persians. The threat of Abyssinian
aggression also always kept Arabia apprehensive. A clear proof of this is the
attack of the Kaaba House by the Christian ruler of Abyssinia, Abraha, who
conquered Yemen in 570 AD with a large army of elephants. However, the entire Arab
country except North and South Arabia was known as an independent land.
(b)
Tribal system: In the
pre-Islamic and Prophetic eras, the Arab political arena had a tribal system of
governance in the absence of a central government. Arabs were divided into
different tribes. In Arabic the tribe is called 'Kabila'. Each gotra was
divided into smaller sections as clans. The divided sections of the gotra were
collectively called 'qaom' or caste. Sometimes several clans made friendly
agreements for coexistence. These treaties were called 'Al-Ahlaf' or alliance
treaties. Tribe was the only key to security in Arab social life. That is why
it became essential to live in a tribe. As sympathetic and friendly as they
were to members of their own clan, they were extremely hostile to enemy clans.
Method of selection of leaders: In Arab clan-based
governance, the leader was the chief of the clan. Every Gaitra had a leader
called 'Shaikh'. 'Shaikh' was elected democratically by checking age,
judgement, intelligence, courage, financial status, experience. Again, the
Shaykh was changed through elections. That's why his tenure was entirely
dependent on the satisfaction of the electorate. The loyalty of the Arabs to
the Shaykh was unquestioned and universally acknowledged. They tried hard to
obey any order of the Shaykh.
(c)
Tribal feuds and wars:
Tribal feuds used to break out over minor issues in that era. And the
continuation of that strife continued through generations of bloody wars. For example the 'Dahis wal Gabra' war between Banu Bakr and Banu Taghlib lasted for forty years. The 'Buyas' war between the Aws and the Khazraj of Madinah and the Quraysh and The 'fizar' war between the Hawazin continued for a long time. And these wars would devolve into protracted clan-to-clan wars over minor issues, such as the use of water canals, grazing of animals, rearing of cattle, etc.
(d) Lack of political unity and stability: There was no political unity among the Arabs during that period. Political unrest and chaos were their constant companions. Their political life was similar to that of primitive times. There was no political awareness among them. And due to the lack of stability, their administrative system was easily changed. And for years everyone had to live in emotional turmoil and instability.
(e) Council of Ministers: However, a Council of Ministers called 'Al-Mala' was formed in Mecca at that time. This council supervised the governance of Makkah and its suburbs. Like the Bedouins, this council of ministers played an active role in forming alliances, foreign commercial and military agreements.
(f) Absence of
Constitution: Constitution is the main driving force of any state or
organization
and organization. No systematic country or
organization can function without a constitution
or constitution.
The Arabs of the Jahili era did not have any constitution suitable for
governing
the country, so they could not take any proper action.
(G) Principle of 'Zor Jaar Muluk Tar': Due to the absence of any proper governance system,'Zor Jaar Muluk Tar' became the main principle of the Arab society during the Jahili era. And as a result Arabs dominated each other through terrorism, intolerance and tribal wars.
(h) Tribal alliances: Mecca and the people of Mecca were of immense importance in the whole of Arabia because of the Kaaba Sharif located in the holy city of Mecca. For this reason, an alliance or clan union was formed between the various branches of the Quraish tribe and some other neighboring tribes. An inter-tribal regime was also developed as suggested by the leaders of this alliance.
(i)
City-state status of
Makkah: Although there was no central government or organized political party
or organization in Arabia, the religious and commercial importance of Makkah
led to the emergence of advanced politics and city-states. At the core of the
governance of the Meccan city-state was the Council of Ministers composed of
Quraish patriarchs. This council is the administrative system of Makkah city
state Supervised. The council's activities also included balancing the various
clans and forming alliances with the Bedouins of neighboring regions.
(j) Administrative System of Makkah: Qusai, an ancestor of the Quraish, on the eve of his death in480 AD, appointed his son Abdud Dar as the Wali or Governor of Makkah. He divided the regime of Makkah into five parts. Namely— (a) Hijab: Covering the house of
Kaaba (b) Siqayah: Distribution of water from the Jamiam well to the pilgrims (c) Rifada: Hajj
(k)
Administrative System of Makkah: Qusai, an ancestor of the Quraish, on the eve
of his death in 480 AD, appointed his son Abdud Dar as the Wali or Governor of
Makkah. He divided the regime of Makkah into five parts. Namely— (a) Hijab:
covering the Kaaba house (b) Siqayah: distribution of water from the Jamiam
well to the pilgrims (c) Rifada: welcoming the Hajj pilgrims to the holy city
of Makkah (d) Nadwa: membership of the executive committee (e) Liwa: hoisting
the flag.
(l) Darun
Nadwah: Along with the renovation of the Kaaba and the division of the Council
of Ministers, Qusai built another palace next to the Kaaba, named 'Darun
Nadwah' or the Council of Ministers. The nobles of the city used to sit in
Darun Nadwa to discuss any problem. But the affairs of the city and the Kaabah,
which were of public concern, were decided by all the citizens in general
assembly in the Kaaba premises.


0 Comments:
Post a Comment